The diagnostic value of second ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of doing a second ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) for thyroid nodules of different sizes that could not be diagnosed by the first US-FNA. METHODS: One hundred and forty-three patients (162 nodules) were diagnosed with suspected malignant thyroid nodules in a routine ultrasound examination, but since the diagnosis could not be confirmed by the cytology of the samples collected in the first US-FNA, the patients underwent US-FNA again 3 months later. The ultrasound results, cytology results, and postoperative pathology of these nodules were collected. The nodules were divided into three groups according to the largest diameter (L) of the thyroid nodules: Group 1, L < 0.5 cm, 26 nodules; Group 2, L = 0.5-1.0 cm, 76 nodules; and Group 3, L > 1.0 cm, 60 nodules. RESULTS: In the second US-FNA, the overall diagnosis rate of the 162 thyroid nodules that could not be given a definitive diagnosis by the first US-FNA was 51.8% (84/162). The definitive diagnosis rates of the nodules in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 30.8% (8/26), 67.1% (51/76), and 41.7% (25/60), respectively. The diagnosis rate was the highest in Group 2, and the differences between this group and the other two groups were statistically significant (χ2  = 10.489, 8.801, p < 0.05 for both). The diagnostic accuracy rates of Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 100% (8/8), 96.1% (49/51), and 92% (23/25), respectively. CONCLUSION: Second US-FNA is highly recommended for such nodules.

Increasing diagnostic effectiveness of thyroid nodule evaluation by implementation of cell block preparation in routine US-FNA analysis

ABSTRACT Objective Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) biopsy has proven to be an accurate and efficient tool in thyroid nodule evaluation. We evaluated whether cell block adds to the diagnostic accuracy of US-FNA. Subjects and methods Three hundred twenty-eight consecutive patients underwent US-FNA, cytology and cell block evaluation. Six slides were prepared for each patient and stained by Papanicolaou and Giemsa techniques. The residual hemorrhagic aspirate in the syringe and needle was fixed in 10% formalin and paraffin-embedded (cell block). The histological sections were examined as a complementary diagnostic tool to US-FNA. Results The study population comprised 89% females and the mean age was 57.4 ± 13.7 years. The mean nodule size was 2.3 ± 1.2 cm. US-FNA cytological results were as follows: Bethesda I, 17.1% (n = 56); Bethesda II, 61.6% (n = 202); Bethesda III, 9.5% (n = 31); Bethesda IV, 5.8% (n = 19); Bethesda V, 2.4% (n = 8), and Bethesda VI, 3.6% (n = 12). Cell blocks were obtained in 100% of cases and were considered diagnostic in 89.6%. Combined cytological and cell block (cyto-cell block) results were as follows: unsatisfactory, 4.3% (n = 14); benign, 72.6% (n = 238); indeterminate, 11.3% (n = 37); follicular lesion, 5.8% (n = 19); suspicious for malignancy, 2.4% (n = 8), and malignant, 3.6% (n = 12). The sensitivity and specificity for cyto-cell block was 100% and 90%, respectively, and the accuracy was 94%. Cyto-cell block analysis reduced the rate of unsatisfactory samples (p < 0.001). Conclusions The cyto-cell block interpretation improved the efficiency of US-FNA. This simple, fast and low-cost technique should be used as an adjunctive test in thyroid nodule evaluation. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2016;60(4):367-73.